The Most Common Differences Between DevOps and DevSecOps

DevOps offers the unique opportunity of integrating the expertise of software developers and IT operations professionals. The application delivery is also a third factor that is considered in DevOps development systems and that helps develop advanced software in less time. 

DevSecOps introduces a security aspect to the regular DevOps principles. How does this differentiate DevSecOps from DevOps? Here are the five main points.

Early introduction of security techniques

Regularly, security is the last thing on the minds of software developers and unfortunately, DevOps teams might also have this distorted perception. To address that issue, DevSecOps was introduced. It ensures that security is introduced at the grassroots level.

Implementing security earlier on the development process will ensure that each piece of code does not have any vulnerability. As a result, the security specifications will be met easily and ensure that the entire software is secure to be deployed. DevOps does not necessarily focus on ensuring that the codebase is secure from the very beginning.

Automation of security testing

If you would like to upgrade your DevOps security to meet DevSecOps standards, it is important to include the automation of security systems. JupiterOne can provide pragmatic solutions that meet the specific needs of the DevOps team you are managing. Automating the security processes is another key difference between DevOps and DevSecOps. 

The latter ensures that testing the code is done periodically and in less time. Also, it continually monitors the compliance of the coding cycle while investigating potential threats. Using reliable security software that automates processes can help you upgrade from DevOps to DevSecOps.

Collective responsibility of security

DevSecOps promotes the collective responsibility and accountability of security in the development process. That means everyone in the team is responsible for the security of the software being developed. 

Letting everybody know their role in ensuring the security of the software is very important. It will promote a secure coding environment that should be adopted by everyone in the team.

Team members that you have handpicked for a certain project must be aware of their responsibility and how they can contribute to the security aspect of software development, so you must also commit to training them to carry out their tasks in a secure manner. DevOps does not focus much on this but ensures and that is what differentiates the two.

Continuous feedback

The development cycle of DevOps teams does not have a continuous feedback loop about the security of the project. DevSecOps principles insist on the implementation of a continuous feedback loop that is operational. A continuous feedback loop continually reminds team members on improving the development of the software being developed. 

The automated system alerts the team members about the threats that have been detected. That allows developers to improve their methodologies to ensure that the same mistakes do not happen again. A continuous feedback loop tries to ensure that the alerts come in real-time.

Better reaction to threats

A DevSecOps approach tries, by all means, to be proactive in resolving software glitches caused by faulty code. That is why the implementation of automation software provides real-time alerts. Developers do not procrastinate on fixing errors because they can fix them right there and then.

It ensures the detected threats do not see the time of day and do not cause any further harm to the development cycle. DevOps does not implement real-time security testing and monitoring systems and that can be hazardous throughout the project. Therefore, DevSecOps proves to be superior because of the difference it has from DevOps.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*